Today we celebrate our Patron Saints, St Peter
and St Paul. When this church was first built someone decided that it would be
dedicated to these two great leaders from the Church’s history. Who made that
choice and when it happened is lost in the mists of time. But the decision was
made, and we were put under the protection of these two great figures. They are
called Patron saints because we are under their patronage. In the thought of
the time, this meant that in the courts of heaven we would have some very powerful
advocates. They’d have a word with God on our behalf if we needed it, just you
might ask an earthly courtier to speak to the king for you. Patron saints were the mediators between
humanity and God, friends in high places; and who better to have as Patrons
than two of the most important leaders of the early church?
Patronage was a normal part of daily experience
in the ancient world. Society wasn’t meritocratic or equal; it didn’t even
pretend to be. Everyone had their place and they knew it. In the Roman social
order if you wanted to make your way in the world you needed to find a patron
to take you under their wing, and there were quite formal agreements made
between patrons and their clients, spelling out the obligations on each side. The
Patron saint was just a heavenly version of what people experienced on earth.
My guess is, though, that the practice of
dedicating churches to particular saints has even deeper roots than this social
arrangement. In pre-Christian times the people who lived here would have worshipped
local gods and goddesses, the spirits of the place, who they believed inhabited
sacred springs and trees and rocks. They just took it for granted that there
was more to life than met the eye, that there were forces that dwelt beyond
their sight in the landscapes where they lived. It mattered that those forces
were on your side if you wanted things to go well for you. When Christianity
arrived I suspect that many people just grafted the saints onto that existing
spirituality, letting them take the place of the local spirits they had prayed
to before. Many of the things churches have traditionally done on their Saints’
days – processions, well-dressing and so on were probably originally about
honouring or placating those local gods. Seal’s local spirits obviously need
strawberries, which we are happy to share with them…as long as we can eat them
too…!
All of this carried on quite naturally right up
until the Reformation, but at that point things changed dramatically. The
Protestant reformers still recognised and revered Christians from the past, the
heroes and heroines of faith, but they insisted that there was only one
mediator between us and God, and that was Jesus Christ. God isn’t like an
earthly king, they said. Heaven isn’t like an earthly court. We don’t need
“friends in high places” because God himself is our friend and we have direct
access to him through Jesus.
They were uneasy, too, at what they saw as
superstitious practices – those rituals which they thought had more than a whiff
of paganism about them. So statues were smashed and pictures destroyed in an
attempt to purge the church of those old beliefs.
It was never going to work completely, though. Banning
the celebration of people’s Patron saints was always going to be a step too
far. Ordinary churchgoers would probably have thought it seemed dangerously
disloyal to abandon their old allegiances; they were far too deeply woven into
the popular consciousness. Anyway, people don’t like it if you take away
their parties. Everyone needs a knees-up now and then. Even the rhythms of
commerce were tied up with Patronal festivals. They were often marked by
charter fairs, as they were here at Seal. They were an important local source of
revenue; do away with saints’ days and your business might suffer.
So the celebration of patron saints clung on in
some form, perhaps less extravagant than before, and here we are today, on the
feast day of Peter and Paul, celebrating not just any saints, but “our” saints.
In doing so, we are celebrating the life of this church and this place as well.
It might seem, from that brief history, that
those Reformers were just killjoys, but I think they did have a point in their
wariness of all this business of saints. The idea of sainthood tends to bring
with it such a lot of baggage - local gods, spirits of place, friends in high
places - that it’s easy to forget that saints like Peter and Paul were real,
flesh and blood people, ordinary people, people like us, people who might have
lived next door, sat next to us on the bus, people who were originally far from
the “heavenly courtiers” that later tradition made them. And when we forget
that, oddly, their power to inspire and influence us is diminished. If they are
superhuman, then there is no way we can be like them, and we are let off the
hook of even trying. We feel we can delegate the work of holiness and mission
to them – they’ll be better at it than we will.
In reality, though, Peter was just a fisherman,
trying to make a living to support his family, hoping for no more than a good
catch and fine weather until he met Jesus. Paul was just a Pharisee, a
religious expert certainly, but one of many in his time, and, of course, one
who was fanatically opposed to the way of Christ, convinced that his message
was blasphemy and that God had proved that by allowing him to be crucified.
This could surely never happen to God’s chosen Messiah, he thought.
Neither Peter nor Paul were promising material
for the job of leaders of the church. If you’d been selecting candidates for
the job, they’d never have made the short list. It’s only with hindsight that
we see how influential they were, shaping the Christian faith, spreading its
message across the world, laying foundations which we still rest on.
My guess is that they would have been
astonished if they’d known that one day there would be churches all over the
world named after them, let alone people eating strawberry teas in their
honour. It was the last thing they were expecting. It’s clear from the New
Testament that they were as surprised as anyone else to find themselves playing
such an important role. All they were doing was responding to the call that
they’d had, dealing with what was in front of them, doing what they could with
integrity and love to spread the message of Christ.
“Come
and follow me”, said Jesus to Peter, and he left his
nets and followed, getting it wrong as often as he got it right, but learning
what he needed to learn along the way, gradually being transformed from Simon
the impulsive fisherman, into Peter, whose name meant the Rock. He was the one
who had the courage to say to Jesus what everyone else is wondering about -
“You are the Messiah, the son of the living God,” the one who later has the
courage to stick to his message, even if it means he is thrown into prison, or
worse, as we heard in our second reading.
Paul’s experience was different, but it was
also a story about transformation. He never met Jesus in person, but when he
heard his voice as he travelled to Damascus, hell-bent on destroying the
fledgling Christian movement, he had the courage to change his mind, to learn
to see anew, to realise that God’s love was bigger than he thought, wider than
he thought and could embrace all.
The impact that Peter and Paul had came not
through any superstar quality they possessed, but simply from their faithful
willingness to hear and respond to God in the circumstances they found
themselves, to do what they could with what they had. And that, to me, is why
they still matter to us, and why, on this Patronal festival I hope we might be
able to draw on their lives to enrich our own ministry and mission.
Peter and Paul discovered that they had work to
do, that God had a purpose for them, despite the fact that they seemed the
least likely people for it. Their lives remind us that however unlikely it
feels to us, God has a purpose for us too, things to do that only we can do.
Those things might seem small, but it is often the small things that make most
difference in the long run. It’s great that here at Seal we have produced an
ordinand in Nicky Harvey – it’s a big commitment - but I am equally delighted
when someone says to me that they want to investigate helping out with the food-bank,
or in the school, or that they want to learn more about their faith, or talk
through some issue that’s been bothering them. In all these ways we show that
we are letting our faith affect our lives, that we are growing in God, letting
him change us, and when that happens those whose lives we touch are changed as
well.
I think Peter and Paul would be astonished to
find that all over the world there are Christian communities that bear their
names and that are celebrating their lives today, but I think they’d be
disappointed if that was as far as it went. As we honour them today, I wonder
whether they in turn might want to ask us – “what about you?” If fishermen
and Pharisees, flawed and fallible like us, can hear God’s call and answer it, can
change their ways and turn their lives around and bring blessing to those
around them, surely you can too? Our church is built on their foundations, and
named for them, but the church of tomorrow needs us to build it.
Amen