Amos 5.6-7, 10-15,
Hebrews 4.12-16, Mark 10.17-31
I was on a preachers’ discussion forum earlier this week,
and noticed that a fellow preacher had asked for a quick yes/no vote on what we
were planning to say about this week’s Gospel reading. He’d set up an online
poll. The question was quite simple. “Are
you going to tell people that they should give up everything and live in
radical poverty, as Jesus told the rich man – sell what you have, give
everything up? Yes, or no? Last time I looked the poll was running at about
50/50. I’m not telling you what I voted. You’ll have to work it out from what I
say!
This is a very tricky passage, one that can make us feel
very uncomfortable. Some Christians have heard a simple, literal message here.
St Anthony heard this story in the fourth century, and gave up all he had and
headed out into the Egyptian desert to live as a hermit. St Francis heard it
and abandoned all his wealth, even taking off the clothes his rich father had
given him and handing them back to him in the public square at Assisi, so that
he ended up standing there stark naked. Jesus’ words to this rich man went
straight to Anthony and Francis hearts, and they took them absolutely
literally, just as I am sure Jesus intended this rich man to do. But does that
mean we should all be doing the same?
The reason my online colleague asked the question was that
he knew there is a real temptation for preachers – for all of us – to try to
explain away Jesus’ challenge. Perhaps it only applies to the rich, we
say – by which we mean “someone richer than I am”. Or perhaps Jesus doesn’t mean us to give away everything,
like St Francis? (Actually I do hope you don’t suddenly feel moved to take all
your clothes off, if you don’t mind! ) But how rich is too rich, and how poor
is poor enough? Perhaps it only applies
to those called to be saints or those with a troubled relationship to
possessions? We can breathe a sigh of relief if that’s not us. One of the most
desperate attempts to remove the sting from this passage is the oft-repeated
story that there was a gate in Jerusalem at the time of Jesus called the “eye
of the needle” which was so small that camels had to be unloaded in order to
pass. Camels could go through eyes of needles, but only if you unloaded
them first. Unfortunately there was no such gate. The story was pure wishful
thinking. Jesus was simply using an image well-known across the Middle East to
describe something that was completely impossible. In India it was an elephant and
the eye of needle.
The truth is that we all want to wriggle off the hook of
this passage. Most of us know that we have too much stuff, and feel faintly
guilty about it. So we try to tame Jesus’ words convincing ourselves that they
don’t really mean what they sound as if they mean, or that he didn’t really
mean us.
I wonder, though, whether we are actually starting in the
wrong place completely with this story. We are so caught up with the second
part of what Jesus says to this man, that we miss the first part. Jesus doesn’t just say “go, sell what you own and give the money to the poor…”. He
says, “You lack one thing; go sell what
you own….” “ You lack one thing.” I don’t think this is a story, primarily,
about what we have. I think it’s a story about what we lack, and how we feel about that lack. Get that right and some of our questions about what
we have might solve themselves.
What does this man lack, the man who already has so much
- wealth, fine clothes, the latest
chariot, and a lot of virtues, it seems too, if we take him at his word about
all those commandments he’s kept? What does he lack? In his own words, it is “eternal life”. That’s what brings him
running to Jesus, throwing himself at his feet – he doesn’t saunter or even
walk purposefully. He runs. It’s his longing for eternal life which makes him
run. What is he looking for? It sounds as if he wants to know
that he is right with God, accepted, secure, but he sees that assurance as
something he can “inherit” and that's very interesting. An inheritance is
something which is paid out to us after someone dies, something coming to us in
the future. It’s a sum of money, or a house, or a collection of original
Beatles records. It’s something we can put in a bank or on a mantelpiece. This
man, who has so many possessions, assumes that eternal life is just one more,
the possession that will complete his collection. It’s the ultimate gift for
the person who has everything, something which he can put in a display case,
store in a safe deposit box, reassured that it’s there for the ultimate rainy
day of his death. It’s a common misunderstanding. Many Christians still see eternal life as just a ticket to heaven, the assurance that when the time comes, St Peter will wave
them in through the pearly gates.
But Jesus doesn’t talk about it like that. When, later in
the passage he says that “in the age to come” his followers will have eternal
life, he isn’t talking about life after death, he’s talking about the Kingdom
of God, the time that he is ushering in there and then, a new way of living, a
new awareness of the presence of God in this world as well as the next. Eternal life isn’t
something you “possess”, like a Rolex watch or a Ferrari. It is something you
live. Perhaps it would be better if we called it “eternal living”. It’s a
quality of life, a way of life, in which everything is tinged with the divine,
in which we find God at every point. Those who live “eternally” assume that
they are walking on holy ground all the time – when they go to the shops, meet
with a friend, respond to someone in need. they are people who have learned to expect that God
will show up in every area of their lives, and learned to welcome him there.
The rich man who comes to Jesus has found that all the
wealth in the world and all the virtues he can cultivate don’t bring him the sense
of inner peace he craves. But as long as he sees it just as a bolt on to the
almost perfect life he has, like the final, rare stamp that will complete his
stamp collection, he will never find it . Jesus knows that his whole life needs
to change, his whole perception of himself. He will have to learn to
acknowledge his lack, to see himself as needy, poor, helpless, powerless, in
order to be open to the riches of God, and the only way that can happen is if
he gives up the comfort blanket of his possessions, all of them, and comes and
follows Jesus, in whom all those riches dwell. The tragedy is that, in the end,
he can’t bring himself to do it.
Jesus may call us to give up all our possessions, or he may
not, but he certainly calls us all to be at home with our need, at home with
the idea of ourselves as beggars, people who, for all our possessions, can never come to a point where we are self-sufficient, people who will always need
God and always need one another.
That’s what eternal living looks like.
As the letter to the Hebrews puts it, we need to be “laid
bare to the eyes of the one to whom we must render an account”, which sounds
horrible, but is actually the beginning of the good news, because when that
happens we are able to “receive mercy and find grace to help in time of need.” The
prophet Amos thunders at his people to
stop thinking they can do whatever they want because they happen to have money
and power. “Seek God and live” (live -there’s that word again). Dethrone
yourself, he says. Accept that you aren’t the great “I am” and put yourself into the hands of the
one who is.
So, back to that poll I started with. Was I going to tell
people they should live in radical poverty? What did I vote? I voted Yes, but not because
I think we should all give up all our possessions. The message of the Bible,
taken as a whole, isn’t that there’s anything wrong with material things in themselves.
I voted Yes because I think that until we discover and accept that we are all
basically poor and helpless, no matter what power and wealth we may seem to
have on the surface, we'll never find the treasure we really need, the knowledge
of God’s ever present love. If we always live in the bright light of our own
strength and capability, we'll never find the God who dwells in the darkness
with us. Sadly, it’s usually only when our lives go wrong that we discover that.
“Blessed are the poor in spirit,”
says Jesus in the Beatitudes. Or, as someone else translated it, “Blessed are those who know their need of
God.”
Today you may have much, or you may have little. You may
have come here today knowing there is money in the bank, food to put on the
table, health and strength to deal with life. Or you may have come here today feeling
lost and lonely, at your wits’ ends, racked with doubt or debt. But in God’s
eyes we are all the same. We are all people who need his love, whether we know
it or not, people whom he longs to lavish his love on, people who have nothing
that is truly our own, and yet people who, because of him, have everything we
could ever truly need.
If we want to be rich in the things that matter, we first
need to recognise what we lack, the thing we can never truly possess, but which is
given to us in full measure, packed down and overflowing, the grace of God, his
presence, which enables us to live eternally, here and now, right where we are.
Amen
No comments:
Post a Comment